University of Leicester
Browse

The effectiveness of delivery modalities of non-pharmacological diabetes prevention programs: A systematic review and component network meta-analysis

Download (2.4 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-10-30, 12:15 authored by Ellesha A Smith, Stephanie HubbardStephanie Hubbard, Suzanne C Freeman, Daniel S March, Molly Wells, Elnaz Saeedi, Louise Haddon, Kamlesh Khunti, Laura J Gray

Background and aims: Type 2 diabetes prevention programs are effective but costly and intensive, making translation into routine primary care and community settings challenging. Identifying drivers of intervention effectiveness can inform pragmatic future implementation whilst maintaining effectiveness. Translational studies have demonstrated that delivery modalities impact their effectiveness. This systematic review and component network meta-analysis assessed which delivery modality components of non-pharmacological diabetes prevention programs are associated with reductions in type 2 diabetes incidence for individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes (or pre-diabetes). 


Methods: We searched MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Opengrey and clinicaltrials.gov from inception to November 17, 2022 for translational studies comparing lifestyle interventions with a minimum 12-month follow-up. Two investigators extracted the data. Random effects network meta-analyses and component network meta-analyses estimated the intervention effects. 


Results: We identified 50 eligible studies involving 29,286 participants including thirty-six (72.0 %) randomized controlled trials, 10 (20.0 %) cluster randomized controlled trials, and four (8.0 %) observational studies. Component network meta-analyses found in-person (individually) delivery was associated with greater reduction in incidence of type 2 diabetes (hazard ratio: 0.66, 95 % credible interval: 0.41, 0.96) and in-person (group-based) delivery was associated with greater reductions in weight (mean difference: −1.53 kg, 95 % credible interval: −2.18, −0.85) and HbA1c (mean difference: −0.74 mmol/mol, 95 % credible interval: −1.28, −0.17), relative to usual care. 


Conclusions: This analysis suggests in-person delivery modalities are most effective for diabetes prevention. Future research should focus on improving the effectiveness of digital programs and ensuring preferential delivery for target populations to reduce health inequalities.

Funding

Complex Evidence Synthesis using Network Meta-Analysis, IPD and Multiple Outcomes: Application Investigating the Effectiveness of Pragmatic Interventions for Diabetes Prevention and Interventions to Increase the Use of Childhood Accident Prevention Practices in the Home.

NIHR Academy

Find out more...

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands (ARC EM)

Leicester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)

History

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences/Cardiovascular Sciences/Population Health Sciences/Medicine

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews

Volume

18

Issue

10

Pagination

103136 - 103136

Publisher

Elsevier BV

issn

1871-4021

eissn

1878-0334

Acceptance date

2024-10-08

Copyright date

2024

Available date

2024-10-30

Spatial coverage

Netherlands

Language

en

Deposited by

Miss Ellesha Smith

Deposit date

2024-10-29

Data Access Statement

The data that supports the findings of this study were derived from the original papers of the studies included in the review, which are available in the public domain. These data are available from the corresponding author, E.A.S., upon reasonable request.

Rights Retention Statement

  • No

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC