University of Leicester
Browse

The impact of immediate breast reconstruction on the time to delivery of adjuvant therapy: the iBRA-2 study.

Download (328.33 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-04-26, 09:31 authored by RL O'Connell, T Rattay, RV Dave, A Trickey, J Skillman, NLP Barnes, M Gardiner, A Harnett, S Potter, C Holcombe, iBRA-2 Steering Group, Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative
BACKGROUND: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is routinely offered to improve quality-of-life for women requiring mastectomy, but there are concerns that more complex surgery may delay adjuvant oncological treatments and compromise long-term outcomes. High-quality evidence is lacking. The iBRA-2 study aimed to investigate the impact of IBR on time to adjuvant therapy. METHODS: Consecutive women undergoing mastectomy ± IBR for breast cancer July-December, 2016 were included. Patient demographics, operative, oncological and complication data were collected. Time from last definitive cancer surgery to first adjuvant treatment for patients undergoing mastectomy ± IBR were compared and risk factors associated with delays explored. RESULTS: A total of 2540 patients were recruited from 76 centres; 1008 (39.7%) underwent IBR (implant-only [n = 675, 26.6%]; pedicled flaps [n = 105,4.1%] and free-flaps [n = 228, 8.9%]). Complications requiring re-admission or re-operation were significantly more common in patients undergoing IBR than those receiving mastectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy was required by 1235 (48.6%) patients. No clinically significant differences were seen in time to adjuvant therapy between patient groups but major complications irrespective of surgery received were significantly associated with treatment delays. CONCLUSIONS: IBR does not result in clinically significant delays to adjuvant therapy, but post-operative complications are associated with treatment delays. Strategies to minimise complications, including careful patient selection, are required to improve outcomes for patients.

Funding

This work received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Shelley Potter is an NIHR Clinician Scientist (CS-2016-16-019). Tim Rattay has received support from the NIHR through a Doctoral Research Fellowship (DRF-2014-07-079) and Academic Clinical Lectureship. This work was undertaken with the support of the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol.

History

Citation

British Journal of Cancer, 2019. 120, pp. 883–895

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Cancer Research Centre

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

British Journal of Cancer

Publisher

Springer Nature, Cancer Research UK

eissn

1532-1827

Acceptance date

2019-02-18

Copyright date

2019

Available date

2019-09-29

Publisher version

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-019-0438-1

Notes

The file associated with this record is under embargo until 6 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC