University of Leicester
Browse
Walkabilitypaper_JPH_amended.pdf (187.38 kB)

The impact of neighbourhood walkability on the effectiveness of a structured education programme to increase objectively measured walking.

Download (187.38 kB)
Version 2 2020-04-22, 15:15
Version 1 2020-04-22, 15:13
journal contribution
posted on 2020-04-22, 15:15 authored by P Carter, DH Bodicoat, A Jones, K Khunti, MJ Davies, CL Edwardson, J Henson, T Yates, E Coombes
Background: Incorporating physical activity into daily activities is key for the effectiveness of lifestyle education interventions aimed at improving health outcomes; however, consideration of the environmental context in which individuals live is not always made. Walkability is a characteristic of the physical environment, and may be a potential facilitator to changing physical activity levels. Methods: Using data collected during the Walking Away from Diabetes randomized controlled trial, we examined the association between the walkability of the home neighbourhood and physical activity of participants. We also determined whether home neighbourhood walkability of participants was associated with the intervention effect of the education programme. Results: Data from 706 participants were available for analysis. Neighbourhood walkability was not significantly associated with any of the physical activity measures at baseline, or at 12, 24 or 36 months following the intervention (P > 0.05 for all). There was no association between walkability and change in purposeful steps/day from baseline to 36 months in the usual care or intervention arm; 25.77 (-99.04, 150.58) and 42.97 (-327.63, 413.45), respectively. Conclusion: Neighbourhood walkability appeared to have no association with objectively measured physical activity in this population. Furthermore, the walkability of participant's neighbourhood did not influence the effectiveness of a lifestyle programme.

Funding

The Walking Away trial was funded by The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland (NIHR CLAHRC—LNR) and East Midlands (NIHR CLAHRC EM). The research was further supported by the University of Leicester Clinical Trials Unit and the NIHR Leicester-Loughborough Diet, Lifestyle and Physical Activity Biomedical Research Unit which is a partnership between University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Loughborough University and the University of Leicester. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

History

Citation

Journal of Public Health, Volume 40, Issue 1, March 2018, Pages 82–89

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Diabetes Research Centre

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Journal of Public Health

Volume

40

Issue

1

Pagination

82-89

eissn

1741-3850

Acceptance date

2016-12-14

Copyright date

2017

Available date

2017-01-09

Publisher version

https://academic.oup.com/jpubhealth/article/40/1/82/2874259

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC