University of Leicester
Browse
- No file added yet -

The impact of surgical delay on resectability of colorectal cancer: An international prospective cohort study

Download (1.01 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-10-01, 10:26 authored by M Adamina, A Ademuyiwa, A Adisa, AA Bhangu, AM Bravo, MF Cunha, S Emile, D Ghosh, JC Glasbey, B Harris, D Keller, S Lawday, H Lederhuber, S Leventoglu, E Li, MM Modolo, R Mittal, HM Mohan, D Nepogodiev, MD Parreño-Sacdalan, F Pata, P Pockney, M Rutegård, N Smart, C Varghese, K Siaw-Acheampong, RA Benson, E Bywater, D Chaudhry, BE Dawson, JP Evans, RR Gujjuri, E Heritage, CS Jones, SK Kamarajah, C Khatri, RA Khaw, JM Keatley, A Knight, HS Mann, EJ Marson, KA McLean, SC Mckay, EC Mills, G Pellino, M Picciochi, EH Taylor, A Tiwari, IM Trout, ML Venn, R JW Wilkin, A Bhangu, NJ Smart, A Minaya-Bravo, G Gallo, S Moug, SD Saverio, A Vallance, D Vimalchandran, EA Griffiths, RPT Evans, P Townend, K Roberts, S McKay, J Isaac, S Satoi, J Edwards, AS Coonar, A Marchbank, EJ Caruana, GR Layton, A Patel, A Brunelli, S Ford, A Desai, A Gronchi, M Fiore, M Almond, F Tirotta, S Dumitra, A Kolias, SJ Price, DM Fountain, MD Jenkinson, P Hutchinson, HJ Marcus, RJ Piper, L Lippa, F Servadei, I Esene

Aim: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to explore the impact of surgical delays on cancer resectability. This study aimed to compare resectability for colorectal cancer patients undergoing delayed versus non-delayed surgery. 


Methods: This was an international prospective cohort study of consecutive colorectal cancer patients with a decision for curative surgery (January–April 2020). Surgical delay was defined as an operation taking place more than 4 weeks after treatment decision, in a patient who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. A subgroup analysis explored the effects of delay in elective patients only. The impact of longer delays was explored in a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome was complete resection, defined as curative resection with an R0 margin. 


Results: Overall, 5453 patients from 304 hospitals in 47 countries were included, of whom 6.6% (358/5453) did not receive their planned operation. Of the 4304 operated patients without neoadjuvant therapy, 40.5% (1744/4304) were delayed beyond 4 weeks. Delayed patients were more likely to be older, men, more comorbid, have higher body mass index and have rectal cancer and early stage disease. Delayed patients had higher unadjusted rates of complete resection (93.7% vs. 91.9%, P = 0.032) and lower rates of emergency surgery (4.5% vs. 22.5%, P < 0.001). After adjustment, delay was not associated with a lower rate of complete resection (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.90–1.55, P = 0.224), which was consistent in elective patients only (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69–1.27, P = 0.672). Longer delays were not associated with poorer outcomes. 


Conclusion: One in 15 colorectal cancer patients did not receive their planned operation during the first wave of COVID-19. Surgical delay did not appear to compromise resectability, raising the hypothesis that any reduction in long-term survival attributable to delays is likely to be due to micro-metastatic disease.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery

Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland

Bowel and Cancer Research

Bowel Disease Research Foundation

Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons

British Association of Surgical Oncology

British Gynaecological Cancer Society

European Society of Coloproctology

Medtronic

Sarcoma UK

The Urology Foundation

Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland

Yorkshire Cancer Research

History

Citation

OVIDSurg Collaborative@CovidSurg. The impact of surgical delay on resectability of colorectal cancer: An international prospective cohort study. Colorectal Dis. 2022; 24: 708–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16117

Author affiliation

Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Colorectal Disease

Volume

24

Issue

6

Pagination

708 - 726

Publisher

Wiley

issn

1462-8910

eissn

1463-1318

Acceptance date

2022-03-06

Copyright date

2022

Available date

2024-10-01

Spatial coverage

England

Language

eng

Data Access Statement

Data-sharing requests will be considered by the management group upon written request to the corresponding author. If agreed, de-identified participant data will be available, subject to a data-sharing agreement.

Rights Retention Statement

  • No

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC