University of Leicester
Browse

The mixed-meal tolerance test as an appetite assay: methodological and practical considerations

Download (1.77 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-09-10, 08:18 authored by James A King, Alice E Thackray, Catherine Gibbons, Catia Martins, David R Broom, David J Stensel, Dimitrios PapamargaritisDimitrios Papamargaritis, Frank Arsenyadis, Graham Finlayson, Grainne WhelehanGrainne Whelehan, Javier T Gonzalez, John Blundell, Kristine Beaulieu, Lewis James, Lore Metz, Mark Hopkins, Masashi Miyashita, Scott A Willis, Vicky Drapeau, David Thivel
<p dir="ltr">Appetite control is a topic which attracts widespread interest given its importance to energy balance and obesity. In this research area, the mixed-meal tolerance test (MM-TT) has emerged as an ‘appetite regulation assay’, facilitating the dynamic assessment of appetite parameters (e.g. subjective appetite perceptions, appetite-related hormones, food reward) in response to an individual meal. The MM-TT is commonly employed in observational and experimental studies to examine population differences and intervention effects. Problematically, no practice standard exists for the MM-TT and protocols vary widely. This presents a challenge for researchers designing new MM-TTs and hampers the comparability of findings. Therefore, within this narrative review we sought to identify and discuss key methodological considerations inherent within a MM-TT. The scope of our review extends to evaluating participant familiarisation and methodological standardisation practices, test meal characteristics, appetite perception assessment, blood sampling techniques, measurement of appetite-related hormones and data handling/analysis. A checklist has been devised to summarise relevant methodological issues identified within this review. This checklist can be used as a tool by researchers to facilitate MM-TT design and promote greater standardisation/comparability between studies. This review highlights the need for broader standardisation of MM-TT procedures to support consistency across future research. Additional research is needed to strengthen the evidence base on which various recommendations are made, particularly relating to participant familiarisation and methodological standardisation practices. Additional scrutiny of less common outcomes employed in MM-TTs (not addressed here), such as diet-induced thermogenesis, gastric emptying and ad libitum energy intake, is also needed.</p>

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre

Leicestershire Healthcare Inequalities Improvement PhD Programme - LHIIP

Wellcome Trust

Find out more...

History

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences Medical Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

International Journal of Obesity

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

issn

0307-0565

eissn

1476-5497

Copyright date

2025

Available date

2025-09-10

Spatial coverage

England

Language

en

Deposited by

Dr Dimitrios Papamargaritis

Deposit date

2025-08-26

Data Access Statement

This review paper does not contain any original data. All information presented is derived from previously published studies, which are cited appropriately within the text. As such, no new data were generated or analysed during the preparation of this manuscript.

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC