The rationale and design of a cross-sectional study to investigate and describe the Chronotype of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and the Effect on Glycaemic Control: The CODEC study
posted on 2019-10-14, 10:51authored byE Brady, A Hall, E Baldry, S Chatterjee, L Daniels, C Edwardson, K Khunti, M Patel, J Henson, A Rowlands, A Smith, T Yates, M Davies
Introduction
A person’s chronotype is their entrained preference for sleep time within the 24-hour clock. It
is described by the well-known concept of the ‘lark’ (early riser) and ‘owl’ (late sleeper).
Evidence suggests that the ‘owl’ is metabolically disadvantaged due to the standard
organisation of our society which favours the ‘lark’ and places physiological stresses on this
chronotype. The aim of this study is to explore cardiometabolic health between the lark and
owl in a population with an established metabolic condition - Type 2 Diabetes.
Methods
This cross-sectional, multi-site study aims to recruit 2247 participants from both secondary
and primary care settings. The primary objective is to compare glycaemic control between
late and early chronotypes. Secondary objectives include determining if late-chronotype is
associated with poorer cardiometabolic health and other lifestyle factors, including well-being,
compared to early-chronotype; describing the prevalence of the five different chronotypes in
this cohort and examining the trends in glycaemic control, cardiometabolic health, well-being
and lifestyle factors across chronotype.
Analysis
The primary outcome (HbA1c), linear regression analysis will compare HbA1c between early
and late chronotypes, with and without adjustment for confounding variables. Chronotype will
be modelled as a categorical variable with all five levels (from extreme-morning to extremelate type), and as a continuous variable to calculate p for trend across the five categories. A
number of models will be created; unadjusted through to adjusted with age, sex, ethnicity,
BMI, duration of diabetes, family history of diabetes, current medication and dietary habits.
All secondary outcomes will be analysed using the same method.
Ethics
Ethical approval from the West Midlands - Black Country Research Ethics Committee
(16/WM/0457).
Dissemination
The results will be disseminated through publication in peer reviewed medical journal,
relevant medical/health conferences and a summary report sent to patients.
Registration details
Registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT02973412 (23.11.20116)
Funding
This work was supported by the Lifestyle theme of the National Institute of Health Research
(NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC).
History
Citation
BMJ Open 2019;9:e027773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027773
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Department of Health Sciences
The data collected to date is unpublished therefore not available within the public domain.
The research team can access this data. Once primary and secondary analysis have been
completed dataset can be requested through the corresponding author.;The file associated with this record is under embargo until publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.