University of Leicester
Browse

The use of magnetite as a geochemical indicator in the exploration for magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE sulfide deposits: a case study from Munali, Zambia

Download (2.15 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2018-01-26, 17:59 authored by Laura A. Ward, David A. Holwell, Tiffany L. Barry, Daryl E. Blanks, Shaun D. Graham
Magmatic sulfide deposits hosted by mafic-ultramafic intrusions are the most important source of Ni and PGE on Earth. Exploration strategies rely on geophysics to identify the host intrusions, and surface geochemistry to identify anomalous concentrations of Cu, Ni, Co, Cr, As and other associated elements. The use of geochemical indicator minerals in overburden is used widely in diamond exploration and mineral chemistry in fresh rock is increasingly used to identify proxies for mineralisation in magmatic-hydrothermal systems. However, no indicator mineral techniques are routinely applied to magmatic sulfides. Magnetite represents an ideal indicator mineral for this mineralisation style due to its ubiquity in such deposits, its resistance to weathering, its recoverability from soil samples, and its chemical variability under differing conditions of formation. We use the Munali Ni sulfide deposit to test the use of magnetite as an indicator mineral. Magnetite from mafic, ultramafic, and magmatic sulfide lithologies in fresh rock at Munali show discernible differences in the most compatible elements (V, Ni, Cr). We propose a new Cr/V versus Ni discrimination diagram for magnetite that can be used to indicate fractionation of the parent magma (Cr/V increases from ultramafic to mafic), and the presence of co-existing sulfides (Ni contents >300ppm). The signatures of these three elements at Munali are comparable to sulfide-related magnetites from other deposits, supporting the broad applicability of the discrimination diagram. Samples taken from overburden directly on top of the Munali deposit replicate signatures in the fresh bedrock, strongly advocating the use of magnetite as an exploration indicator mineral. Samples from areas without any geophysical or geochemical anomalies show weak mineralisation signatures, whereas magnetite samples taken from prospects with such anomalies display mineralisation signatures. Magnetite is a thus a viable geochemical indicator mineral for magmatic sulfide mineralisation in early stage exploration.

Funding

The management and staff of Consolidated Nickel Mines and Mabiza Resources, in particular Simon Purkiss and Matthew Banda, are thanked for logistical and financial support for LAW’s MGeol project work. Assistance in the field from Danny Musemeka, Chloe Mitchell and Grace Howe are acknowledged. Carl Zeiss Microscopy is acknowledged for access to Mineralogic Mining software and SEM analysis and both technical and financial support of LAW’s MGeol project.

History

Citation

Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2018, 188, pp. 172–184

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING/School of Geography, Geology and the Environment

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Journal of Geochemical Exploration

Publisher

Elsevier

issn

0375-6742

eissn

1879-1689

Acceptance date

2018-01-23

Copyright date

2018

Available date

2019-01-31

Publisher version

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375674217307008

Notes

The file associated with this record is under embargo until 12 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC