posted on 2018-01-26, 17:59authored byLaura A. Ward, David A. Holwell, Tiffany L. Barry, Daryl E. Blanks, Shaun D. Graham
Magmatic sulfide deposits hosted by mafic-ultramafic intrusions are the most important
source of Ni and PGE on Earth. Exploration strategies rely on geophysics to identify the host
intrusions, and surface geochemistry to identify anomalous concentrations of Cu, Ni, Co, Cr,
As and other associated elements. The use of geochemical indicator minerals in overburden is
used widely in diamond exploration and mineral chemistry in fresh rock is increasingly used
to identify proxies for mineralisation in magmatic-hydrothermal systems. However, no
indicator mineral techniques are routinely applied to magmatic sulfides. Magnetite represents
an ideal indicator mineral for this mineralisation style due to its ubiquity in such deposits, its
resistance to weathering, its recoverability from soil samples, and its chemical variability
under differing conditions of formation. We use the Munali Ni sulfide deposit to test the use
of magnetite as an indicator mineral. Magnetite from mafic, ultramafic, and magmatic sulfide
lithologies in fresh rock at Munali show discernible differences in the most compatible
elements (V, Ni, Cr). We propose a new Cr/V versus Ni discrimination diagram for magnetite
that can be used to indicate fractionation of the parent magma (Cr/V increases from
ultramafic to mafic), and the presence of co-existing sulfides (Ni contents >300ppm). The
signatures of these three elements at Munali are comparable to sulfide-related magnetites
from other deposits, supporting the broad applicability of the discrimination diagram.
Samples taken from overburden directly on top of the Munali deposit replicate signatures in
the fresh bedrock, strongly advocating the use of magnetite as an exploration indicator
mineral. Samples from areas without any geophysical or geochemical anomalies show weak
mineralisation signatures, whereas magnetite samples taken from prospects with such
anomalies display mineralisation signatures. Magnetite is a thus a viable geochemical
indicator mineral for magmatic sulfide mineralisation in early stage exploration.
Funding
The management and staff of Consolidated Nickel Mines and Mabiza Resources, in particular
Simon Purkiss and Matthew Banda, are thanked for logistical and financial support for
LAW’s MGeol project work. Assistance in the field from Danny Musemeka, Chloe Mitchell
and Grace Howe are acknowledged. Carl Zeiss Microscopy is acknowledged for access to
Mineralogic Mining software and SEM analysis and both technical and financial support of
LAW’s MGeol project.
History
Citation
Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2018, 188, pp. 172–184
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING/School of Geography, Geology and the Environment
The file associated with this record is under embargo until 12 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.