posted on 2019-06-17, 11:05authored bySachin Khunti, Kamlesh Khunti, Samuel Seidu
Early glycaemic control leads to better outcomes, including a reduction in long-term macrovascular and microvascular complications. Despite good-quality evidence, glycaemic control has been shown to be inadequate globally. Therapeutic inertia has been shown present in all stages of treatment intensification, from the first oral antihyperglycaemic drug (OAD), all the way to the initiation of insulin. The causes and possible solutions to the problem of therapeutic inertia are complex but can be understood better when viewed from the perspective of the providers [healthcare professionals (HCPs)], patients and healthcare systems. In this review, we will discuss the possible aetiologies, consequences and solutions of therapeutic inertia, drawing upon evidence from published literature on the subject of type 2 diabetes.
Funding
SS and KK acknowledge support from the National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC), East Midlands and the NIHR Leicester Lifestyle Biomedical Research Unit.
History
Citation
Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2019, 10, 1-11
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Diabetes Research Centre
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Published in
Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism