posted on 2016-11-07, 10:12authored byPamela J. Carter
Projects are ubiquitous throughout the management of public services and the
implementation of public policy but implementation processes often remain a ‘black box’.
This article argues that technical approaches to project management neglect the role of
power. Combining Foucault’s concept of the productive power of governmentality with the
notion of timescapes into an analytical lens, the ethnography opens up the black box to reveal
how project management functions as a powerful disciplinary technique. I show what escapes
the imposed boundaries of the project as, in contrast to rational representations of the
linearity of the project life cycle, decisions are retrospectively framed and the past rewritten.
Simultaneously, project managers attempt to bring an uncertain future under control,
discursively enrolling actors into their visions. Discursive and symbolic meanings of projects
link to materiality as resources are represented as plentiful or meagre. Financial year-end
exerts a disciplinary force so that time gets compressed and decision making becomes
expedient. As resources move between budgets, governmentality is enacted, while budget
headings of ‘other’ account for inevitable remaindering. Creative ‘time tactics’ are an
adaptive response to achieving externally imposed targets while performing local project
success. It turns out that time is at once metaphysical and mundane.
History
Citation
Time & Society, 2016
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Medicine/Department of Health Sciences