University of Leicester
Browse

Understanding how to build a social licence for using novel linked datasets for planning and research in Kent, Surrey and Sussex: results of deliberative focus groups.

Download (1.64 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-02-06, 10:45 authored by Elizabeth Ford, Melanie Rees-Roberts, Kathryn Stanley, Katie Goddard, Sarah Giles, Jo Armes, Deborah IkhileDeborah Ikhile, Anotida Madzvamuse, Victoria Spencer-Hughes, Abraham George, Chris Farmer, Jackie Cassell

Introduction: Digital programmes in the newly created NHS integrated care boards (ICBs) in the United Kingdom mean that curation and linkage of anonymised patient data is underway in many areas for the first time. In Kent, Surrey and Sussex (KSS), in Southeast England, public health teams want to use these datasets to answer strategic population health questions, but public expectations around use of patient data are unknown. Objectives: We aimed to engage with citizens of KSS to gather their views and expectations of data linkage and re-use, through deliberative discussions. Methods: We held five 3-hour deliberative focus groups with 79 citizens of KSS, presenting information about potential uses of data, safeguards, and mechanisms for public involvement in governance and decision making about datasets. After each presentation, participants discussed their views in facilitated small groups which were recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. Results: The focus groups generated 15 themes representing participants' views on the benefits, risks and values for safeguarding linked data. Participants largely supported use of patient data to improve health service efficiency and resource management, preventative services and out of hospital care, joined-up services and information flows. Most participants expressed concerns about data accuracy, breaches and hacking, and worried about commercial use of data. They suggested that transparency of data usage through audit trails and clear information about accountability, ensuring data re-use does not perpetuate stigma and discrimination, ongoing, inclusive and valued involvement of the public in dataset decision-making, and a commitment to building trust, would meet their expectations for responsible data use. Conclusions: Participants were largely favourable about the proposed uses of patient linked datasets but expected a commitment to transparency and public involvement. Findings were mapped to previous tenets of social license and can be used to inform ICB digital programme teams on how to proceed with use of linked datasets in a trustworthy and socially acceptable way.

Funding

Unlocking data to inform public health policy and practice: Exploring barriers and creating solutions for public health intelligence using integrated datasets across Kent, Sussex and Surrey (KSS)

NIHR Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre

Find out more...

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Kent, Surrey and Sussex

National Institute for Health Research

Find out more...

History

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences Population Health Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

International Journal of Population Data Science

Volume

5

Issue

3

Pagination

13

Publisher

Swansea University

eissn

2399-4908

Copyright date

2023

Available date

2025-02-06

Language

en

Deposited by

Dr Deborah Ikhile

Deposit date

2025-01-22

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC