University of Leicester
Browse

Use of hierarchical models to analyze European trends in congenital anomaly prevalence

Download (723.21 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2016-10-27, 12:32 authored by A. Cavadino, D. Prieto-Merino, M. C. Addor, L. Arriola, F. Bianchi, Elizabeth Draper, E. Garne, R. Greenlees, M. Haeusler, B. Khoshnood, J. Kurinczuk, B. McDonnell, V. Nelen, M. O'Mahony, H. Randrianaivo, J. Rankin, A. Rissmann, D. Tucker, C. Verellen-Dumoulin, H. de Walle, D. Wellesley, J. K. Morris
BACKGROUND: Surveillance of congenital anomalies is important to identify potential teratogens. Despite known associations between different anomalies, current surveillance methods examine trends within each subgroup separately. We aimed to evaluate whether hierarchical statistical methods that combine information from several subgroups simultaneously would enhance current surveillance methods using data collected by EUROCAT, a European network of population-based congenital anomaly registries. METHODS: Ten-year trends (2003 to 2012) in 18 EUROCAT registries over 11 countries were analyzed for the following groups of anomalies: neural tube defects, congenital heart defects, digestive system, and chromosomal anomalies. Hierarchical Poisson regression models that combined related subgroups together according to EUROCAT's hierarchy of subgroup coding were applied. Results from hierarchical models were compared with those from Poisson models that consider each congenital anomaly separately. RESULTS: Hierarchical models gave similar results as those obtained when considering each anomaly subgroup in a separate analysis. Hierarchical models that included only around three subgroups showed poor convergence and were generally found to be over-parameterized. Larger sets of anomaly subgroups were found to be too heterogeneous to group together in this way. CONCLUSION: There were no substantial differences between independent analyses of each subgroup and hierarchical models when using the EUROCAT anomaly subgroups. Considering each anomaly separately, therefore, remains an appropriate method for the detection of potential changes in prevalence by surveillance systems. Hierarchical models do, however, remain an interesting alternative method of analysis when considering the risks of specific exposures in relation to the prevalence of congenital anomalies, which could be investigated in other studies. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:480-10, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

History

Citation

Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 2016, 106 (6), pp. 480-488

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Medicine/Department of Health Sciences

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology

Publisher

Wiley for 1. Teratology Society 2. Wiley-Liss

issn

1542-0752

eissn

1542-0760

Acceptance date

2016-03-23

Copyright date

2016

Available date

2017-06-14

Publisher version

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdra.23515/abstract

Notes

Following the embargo period the above license applies.

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC