Use of procalcitonin for the diagnosis of pneumonia in patients presenting with a chief complaint of dyspnoea: Results from the BACH (Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure) trial
posted on 2012-10-24, 08:55authored byA. Maisel, J. Landsberg, P. Clopton, S-X. Neath, G. Terracciano, C. Mueller, M. Potocki, R. M. Nowak, J. McCord, W. F. Peacock, P. Ponikowski, M. Möckel, N. G. Morgenthaler, S. D. Anker, C. Hogan, A. H. B. Wu, L. B. Daniels, M. Richards, G. S. Filippatos, S. Di Somma, I. Anand, Leong L. Ng, R. H. Christenson, O Hartmann, A. Bergmann
Aims
Biomarkers have proven their ability in the evaluation of cardiopulmonary diseases. We investigated the utility of concentrations of the biomarker procalcitonin (PCT) alone and with clinical variables for the diagnosis of pneumonia in patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with a chief complaint of shortness of breath.
Methods and results
The BACH trial was a prospective, international, study of 1641 patients presenting to EDs with dyspnoea. Blood samples were analysed for PCT and other biomarkers. Relevant clinical data were also captured. Patient outcomes were assessed at 90 days. The diagnosis of pneumonia was made using strictly validated guidelines. A model using PCT was more accurate [area under the curve (AUC) 72.3%] than any other individual clinical variable for the diagnosis of pneumonia in all patients, in those with obstructive lung disease, and in those with acute heart failure (AHF). Combining physician estimates of the probability of pneumonia with PCT values increased the accuracy to >86% for the diagnosis of pneumonia in all patients. Patients with a diagnosis of AHF and an elevated PCT concentration (>0.21 ng/mL) had a worse outcome if not treated with antibiotics (P = 0.046), while patients with low PCT values (<0.05 ng/mL) had a better outcome if they did not receive antibiotic therapy (P = 0.049).
Conclusion
Procalcitonin may aid in the diagnosis of pneumonia, particularly in cases with high diagnostic uncertainty. Importantly, PCT may aid in the decision to administer antibiotic therapy to patients presenting with AHF in which clinical uncertainty exists regarding a superimposed bacterial infection.
Funding
A.M., research support from Roche, Biosite,
and Bayer; consultant for Biosite. S.-X.N., consultant for ThermoFisher
Scientific. C.M., research grants from The Swiss National
Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, the Novartis
Foundation, the Krokus Foundation, Abbott, Biosite, BRAHMS,
Roche, and the University of Basel. R.M.N., research support
from BRAHMS. W.F.P., Scientific Advisory Board of Abbott,
Beckman-Coulter, Biosite, Inverness, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics,
and Response Biomedical; research grants from Abbott, Biosite,
and Inverness. M.R., Scientific Advisory Board of Inverness
Medical; travel support, honoraria, and research grants from
Roche Diagnostics and Inverness Medical (Biosite). G.S.F., research
support from Biosite, BRAHMS, and Roche. S.D.S., consultant for
Biosite. L.L.N., research support from BRAHMS, Inverness, and
Medical Innovations. L.B.D., research grant from Roche. O.H.,
employee of BRAHMS GmbH. A.B. and N.G.M., former employees
of BRAHMS GmbH. S.D.A., research support from BRAHMS; honoraria
from Abbott and Biosite; consultant for BRAHMS.
History
Citation
European Journal of Heart Failure, 2012, 14 (3), pp. 278-286
Published in
European Journal of Heart Failure
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP) for European Society of Cardiology