University of Leicester
Browse
Observation care paper 20160902 for LRA.pdf (456.03 kB)

Use or abuse? A qualitative study of physicians’ views on use of observation stays at three hospitals in the United States and England

Download (456.03 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2016-11-09, 15:58 authored by Graham P. Martin, Brad Wright, Azeemuddin Ahmed, Jay Banerjee, Suzanne Mason, Damian Roland
Objective: Accumulating evidence has seen increasing use of observation stays for patients presenting to EDs requiring diagnostic workup or time-limited treatment plans, but critics suggest that this expansion arises from hospitals’ concerns to maximize revenue, and shifts costs to patients. Perspectives of physicians making decisions to admit, observe or discharge have been absent from the debate. We examined the views of emergency physicians in the US and England on observation stays, and what influences their decisions to use observation services. Methods: We undertook in-depth, qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of physicians in three hospitals across the two countries, and analyzed these using an approach based on the constantcomparison method. Limitations include the number of sites, whose characteristics are not generalizable to all institutions, and the reliance on self-reported interview accounts. Results: Physicians used observation status for the specific presentations for which it is well-evidenced, but acknowledged administrative and financial considerations in their decision making. They also highlighted an important role for observation not described in the literature: as a ‘safe space’, relatively immune from the administrative gaze, where diagnostic uncertainties, socio-medical problems and medico-legal challenges could be contained. Conclusions: Observation status increases the options available to admitting physicians in a way that they valued for its potential benefits to patient safety and quality of care, but some of these have been neglected in the literature to date. Reform to observation status should address these important but previously unacknowledged functions.

History

Citation

Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2016, 69(3), pp. 284–292.e2

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Medicine/Department of Health Sciences

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Annals of Emergency Medicine

Publisher

Elsevier

issn

196-0644

eissn

1097-6760

Acceptance date

2016-08-25

Copyright date

2016

Available date

2017-11-23

Publisher version

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196064416309362

Notes

The file associated with this record is under embargo until 12 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC