University of Leicester
Browse

Using ethnography to study improving healthcare: reflections on the ‘ethnographic’ label

Download (55.93 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2018-03-23, 12:41 authored by Caroline Cupit, Nicola Mackintosh, Natalie Armstrong
While methods broadly described as ‘ethnographic’ have been increasingly employed to research the organisation and delivery of healthcare,[1-4] a single or widely-accepted definition of ethnography has proved elusive and perhaps unnecessary.[1,5] Nonetheless, even as authors publishing in this journal have adapted ethnographic approaches for the purpose of studying improving quality and safety in healthcare, they have often attempted to retain some of its anthropological “essence”.[6] For instance, Dixon-Woods [7] characterises ethnography in terms of its focus on observational methods, questioning of the taken for granted, description and analysis of routine behaviours in their natural settings, and use of the researcher’s own skill and judgement to both gather data and to interpret them drawing on social theory.

History

Citation

BMJ Quality and Safety, 2018, Volume 27, (4)

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Department of Health Sciences

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

BMJ Quality and Safety

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group

issn

2044-5415

eissn

2044-5423

Acceptance date

2018-02-06

Copyright date

2018

Available date

2018-03-23

Publisher version

http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/27/4/258

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC