posted on 2016-02-16, 11:54authored byBrett Sylvester Matulis
This paper is a reply to Esteve Corbera's critique of my earlier commentary on the economic valuation of nature. It seeks to clarify my motivations and objectives in writing the original piece. It highlights important distinctions between our positions and explains why acceptance of financialized approaches to conservation (in any of its guises) works to deepen the embedded nature of neoliberal ideology.
History
Citation
Ecological Economics, 2015, 110, pp. 158-160
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING/Department of Geology
Version
AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Published in
Ecological Economics
Publisher
Elsevier for International Society for Ecological Economics (ISEE)
The file associated with this record is under a 24-month embargo from publication in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.