posted on 2016-02-16, 11:54authored byBrett Sylvester Matulis
This paper is a reply to Esteve Corbera's critique of my earlier commentary on the economic valuation of nature. It seeks to clarify my motivations and objectives in writing the original piece. It highlights important distinctions between our positions and explains why acceptance of financialized approaches to conservation (in any of its guises) works to deepen the embedded nature of neoliberal ideology.
The file associated with this record is under a 24-month embargo from publication in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.