posted on 2018-01-16, 15:31authored byThomas R. Palser, Adam Ceney, Alex Navarro, Simon Swift, David J. Bowrey, Ian J. Beckingham
Background
Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS) remains central to the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease but the scale and variation in provision in England is unknown. The aims of this study were firstly to examine the processes and outcomes of anti-reflux surgery in England and compare them to national guidelines and secondly to explore potential variations in practice nationally and establish peer benchmarks.
Methods
All adult patients who underwent laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery in England during the Financial years FY 2011/12 – FY 2016/17 were identified in the Surgeon’s Workload Outcomes and Research Database (SWORD), which is based on the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data warehouse. Outcomes included activity volume, day-case rate, short-stay rate, 2 and 30-day readmission rates and 30-day re-operation rates. Funnel plots were used to identify national variation in practice.
Results
In total, 12,086 patients underwent LARS in England during the study period. The operation rate decreased slightly over the study period from 5.2 to 4.6 per 100,000 people. Most outcomes were in line with national guidelines including the conversion rate (0.76%), 30-day re-operation rate (1.43%) and 2- and 30-day readmission rates (1.65% and 8.54% respectively). The day-case rate was low but increased from 7.4% to 15.1% during the five year period. Significant variation was found, particularly in terms of hospital volume, and day-case, short-stay and conversion rates.
Conclusion: Although overall outcomes are comparable to studies from other countries, there is significant variation in anti-reflux surgery activity and outcomes in England. We recommend that units use this data to drive local quality improvement efforts.
Funding
The Surgical Workload and Outcomes Research Database (SWORD) is funded by the Association of Upper Gastro-intestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS) and the Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ALSGBI). Methods Analytics Ltd. was not paid for any of the work involved in this paper.
History
Citation
Surgical Endoscopy, 2018
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Department of Health Sciences
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy
Publisher
Springer Verlag (Germany), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES)