University of Leicester
Browse

What can go wrong in child arrangement proceedings where there are allegations of domestic abuse?

Download (541.17 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2022-10-10, 13:11 authored by Mandy Burton
Research suggests that there are significant problems with the way that the family courts deal with child arrangement proceedings involving domestic abuse. As allegations of domestic abuse are present in the majority of cases reaching the courts for a decision about who a child should spend time with, it is essential that the process and outcomes are safe for non-abusive parents and children. However, the recent conjoined appeal Re-H-N and others highlights flaws with the fact finding process and the presumption of parental involvement, resulting in minimisation of domestic abuse. These flaws were also identified by the 'Harm Panel' report (2020), which made recommendations for fundamental reforms. The Court of Appeal does not specify the nature of the reforms needed, but does confirm the need for a fresh approach. This case note will consider what went wrong in the four cases considered by the appellate court and how the cases bolster the urgent need for reform.

History

Author affiliation

School of Law, University of Leicester

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

Volume

43

Issue

4

Pagination

471 - 474

Publisher

Routledge (Taylor and Francis)

issn

0964-9069

eissn

1469-9621

Copyright date

2021

Available date

2022-10-10

Language

English

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC