University of Leicester
Browse
- No file added yet -

What do research ethics committees say about applications to conduct research involving children?

Download (247.38 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2011-05-16, 14:34 authored by Emma L. Angell, H. Biggs, F. Gahleitner, Mary Dixon-Woods
Objective: To identify issues raised by research ethics committees (RECs) in letters about applications to conduct research involving children. Methods: Analysis of 80 provisional and unfavourable opinion decision letters written by RECs in response to applications to conduct research involving child participants. Results: RECs were most likely to be concerned about issues relating to consent, recruitment, care and protection of participants, scientific design and confidentiality. RECs focused on children's status as “vulnerable”. They sought to ensure that children would be protected, that appropriate written language would be used to communicate with children and that an appropriate person would give consent for children to participate. Implications: Researchers should be attentive to issues of potential vulnerability when preparing applications. REC letters may be improved by giving clear and explicit reasons for their opinions.

History

Citation

Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2010, 95 (11), pp. 915-917.

Published in

Archives of Disease in Childhood

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group

issn

0003-9888

Available date

2011-05-16

Publisher version

http://adc.bmj.com/content/95/11/915

Notes

This is the author’s final draft of the paper published as Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2010, 95 (11), pp. 915-917. The final published version is available at http://adc.bmj.com/content/95/11/915. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2009.172395

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC