posted on 2015-06-10, 14:48authored byRosemary H. Sweet
This article offers an analysis of the preparation, publication and reception of the two separate versions of
Pompeiana
,
texts
which exercised a formative influence over Victorian
understanding of not just Roman
Pompeii, but of domestic Roman life more broadly
throughout the nineteenth century
, and which highlight a
transition from eighteenth
-
century antiquarianism to a more ‘archaeological’ approach to the past in the
nineteenth c
entury
. Using unpublished correspondence that has
been overlooked by
other
scholarship on
Gell, i
t argues that the form and content of the volumes
responded to
both
contemporary fascination with
the history of domestic life
and
the
need for
an affordable volume on Pompeii. But
the volumes
also
reflected many of Gell’s more personal interests, developed in a career of travelling
in Greece, Asia Minor
and Spain, and were a product of his circumstances: they were conceived in order that Gell
(a
nd
his co
-
adjutor
Gandy in the
first
edition
)
might
earn much
-
needed additional income and
were a means
through
which Gell could consolidate his social position in Naples by establishing his authoritative expertise on
Pompeii.
History
Citation
Papers of the British School at Rome, 2015, 83, pp. 245-281
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF ARTS, HUMANITIES AND LAW/School of History
Version
AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Published in
Papers of the British School at Rome
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP) for British School at Rome