posted on 2019-05-01, 08:54authored byIM McHardy, SD Connolly, K Horne, EM Cackett, J Gelbord, BM Peterson, M Pahari, N Gehrels, M Goad, P Lira, P Arevalo, RD Baldi, N Brandt, E Breedt, H Chand, G Dewangan, C Done, M Elvis, D Emmanoulopoulos, MM Fausnaugh, S Kaspi, CS Kochanek, K Korista, IE Papadakis, AR Rao, P Uttley, M Vestergaard, MJ Ward
We report the results of intensive X-ray, UV, and optical monitoring of the Seyfert 1 galaxy
NGC 4593 with Swift. There is no intrinsic flux-related spectral change in any variable
component with small apparent variations being due to contamination by a constant hard
(reflection) component in the X-rays and the red host galaxy in the UV/optical. Relative to the
shortest wavelength band, UVW2, the lags of the other UV/optical bands mostly agree with the
predictions of reprocessing of high energy emission by an accretion disc. The U-band lag is,
however, larger than expected, probably because of reprocessed Balmer continuum emission
from the distant broad line region (BLR). The UVW2 band is well correlated with the X-rays
but lags by ∼6× more than expected if the UVW2 results only from reprocessing of X-rays
by the disc. However, if the light curves are filtered to remove variations on time-scales >5
d, the lag approaches the expectation from disc reprocessing. MEMECHO analysis shows that
direct X-rays can be the driver of most of the UV/optical variations if the response functions
have tails up to 10 d, from BLR reprocessing, together with strong peaks at short lag (<1 d)
from disc reprocessing. For the 5 AGN monitored so far, the observed UVW2 to V-band lags
are <
∼2 of disc reprocessing expectations and vary little between AGN. However, the X-ray to
UVW2 lags greatly exceed disc reprocessing expectations and differ between AGN. The two
most absorbed AGN have the largest excesses, so absorption and scattering may affect these
lags, but there is no simple relationship between excess and absorption.
Funding
IMM acknowledges support from a Royal Society Leverhulme Trust Research Fellowship LT160006 and from Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) grant ST/M001326/1. KH acknowledges support from STFC grant ST/M001296/1 and JG acknowledges support from the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) under awards NNX15AH49G and 80NSSC17K0126. MV acknowledges financial support from the Danish Council for Independent Research via grant DFF 4002-00275. MP acknowledges support from a Royal Society Science and Engineering Research Board Newton International Fellowship. This work made use of data supplied by the UK Swift Science Data Centre at the University of Leicester.
History
Citation
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2018, 480 (3), pp. 2881-2897 (17)
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING/Department of Physics and Astronomy
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Published in
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP), Royal Astronomical Society