posted on 2006-12-19, 16:10authored byPatrizia Romano, Alberto Moretti, P.L. Banat, David N. Burrows, Sergio Campana, Guido Chincarini, S. Covino, D. Malesani, Gianpiero Tagliaferri, Shiho Kobayashi, B. Zhang, Abraham D. Falcone, Lorella Angelini, Scott D. Barthelmy, Andrew P. Beardmore, M. Capalbi, Giancarlo Cusumano, Paolo Giommi, Michael R. Goad, Olivier Godet, Dirk Grupe, Joanne E. Hill, Jamie A. Kennea, V. La Parola, V. Mangano, P. Mészáros, David C. Morris, John A. Nousek, Paul T. O'Brien, Julian P. Osborne, A. Parsons, M. Perri, Claudio Pagani, Kim L. Page, Alan A. Wells, Neil Gehrels
We present observations of XRF 050406, the first burst detected by Swift showing a flare in its X-ray light curve. During this flare, which peaks at tpeak ~ 210 s after the BAT trigger, a flux variation of δF/F ~ 6 in a very short time δt/tpeak << 1 was observed. Its measured fluence in the 0.2−10 keV band was ~∼1.4 × 10−8 erg cm−2, which corresponds to 1−15% of the prompt fluence. We present indications of spectral
variations during the flare. We argue that the producing mechanism is late internal shocks, which implies that the central engine is still active at 210 s, though with a reduced power with respect to the prompt emission. The X-ray light curve flattens to a very shallow slope with decay index of ~0.5 after ~4400 s, which also supports continued central engine activity at late times. This burst is classified as an X-ray flash, with a relatively low fluence (~10−7 erg cm−2 in the 15−350 keV band, Eiso ~ 1051 erg), a soft spectrum (photon index 2.65), no significant flux above ~50 keV and a peak energy Ep < 15 keV. XRF 050406 is one of the first examples of a well-studied X-ray light curve of an XRF. We show that the main afterglow characteristics are qualitatively similar to those of normal GRBs. In particular, X-ray flares superimposed on a
power-law light curve have now been seen in both XRFs and GRBs. This indicates that a similar mechanism may be at work for both kinds of events.