posted on 2015-11-09, 11:10authored byDawn E. Watkins
This paper sets out the findings of a doctrinal study that has sought to establish a child’s ‘standing’ under English law, focussing primarily on children aged 7-11 years.
It will demonstrate that the legal provisions that apply to children’s everyday lives are piecemeal
and inconsistent, but more importantly, it will argue that even though the child possesses a
broad range of rights under the UNCRC, he or she is much more clearly recognised and acknowledged as a wrongdoer than a
‘right-doer’ under English law.
Following a close analysis of Article 12, the author goes on to discuss emerging scholarship concerning the
capabilities approach and its relationship to children’s rights.
This is then suggested as a possible basis for shifting our thinking and practice in this area; from a place that recognises
children’s capacities not only as wrongdoers and as rights holders, but also increasingly as
‘potentially competent’ social actors and influencers.
.
History
Citation
Child and Family Law Quarterly, 2016, 28 (1), pp. 25-44
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/School of Law