2016KaczmarekCRPhD.pdf (17.52 MB)
Download fileA Name and a Place: Settlement and Land Use Patterns, Identity Expression and Social Strategies in Hellenistic and Roman Thessaly
thesis
posted on 2016-03-17, 14:48 authored by Crysta KaczmarekTheories that presented decline and depopulation as defining characteristics of
Greece at the transitions from the Hellenistic to the Roman period have been
challenged by recent regional studies that investigated landscape, political,
economic and social change. This thesis adds to this growing discourse by
investigating the impact of, and responses to, increasing Roman hegemony in
Thessaly from the 2nd century BCE to the 2nd century CE. This thesis focuses on
quantitative and qualitative evidence for change in three inter-related aspects, (1)
settlement and land use, (2) identity expression and (3) reciprocal benefactions. The
results highlight the complex and regionally specific impact of Roman hegemony as
well as the discrepant responses of local elite members of the population.
Urbanization, a decrease in small settlement site numbers and a rise in the number
of large rural estates, villae rusticae, and imperial estates, all indicating changes in
land ownership patterns, are characteristic of the middle Hellenistic and early
Roman periods in Thessaly. Epigraphic data demonstrate that honorary grants,
particularly citizenship and land ownership rights, peaked in the 2nd century BCE
followed by a gradual decline. This suggests that during the transitional period
towards Roman rule, elite citizens increasingly engaged in the system of euergetism
in order to accumulate property and obtain citizenship in poleis other than their own
as part of their strategies for social advancement. With the advent of the Principate,
elite members of society engaged more frequently with the Roman authority
through honouring members of the imperial family and participating in the imperial
cult. In addition, the increasing number of local elite members of society who
obtained Roman citizenship and adopted Roman nomenclature, while maintaining
their Greek personal name in place of the cognomen highlights how the local elites
became Roman but stayed Thessalian.
History
Supervisor(s)
Mattingly, David; Shipley, GrahamDate of award
2016-03-03Author affiliation
School of Archaeology and Ancient HistoryAwarding institution
University of LeicesterQualification level
- Doctoral
Qualification name
- PhD