posted on 2015-01-16, 11:52authored byStuart Christopher Wright
Major changes to the interpretation and application of the law of self-determination
have taken place since the era of decolonisation. Notably, because most non-selfgoverning
territories have attained independence, analyses have shifted by looking at
the internal application of self-determination. Although competing theories have
generally defined internal self-determination as conditions under which human rights,
democratic representation and access to the right to development are realised, there is
continued uncertainty about how the concept is applied. In this regard, questions
emerge about the linkage between internal self-determination and external selfdetermination
within the self-determination continuum and particularly, whether
territorial minorities can secede based on claims of oppression arising from state failure
to satisfy conditions associated with internal self-determination.
This thesis proposes that a global governance approach is required for understanding
and applying post-colonial self-determination. Unlike other analyses, it is argued that
the conditions relative to internal self-determination are case-specific. This means that
the application of internal self-determination will be influenced by specific legal and
extra-legal considerations affecting the parties in the minority-state relationship.
Significantly, the actual conditions of internal self-determination may look different in
each case, even though a normative process of evaluation is applied. A global
governance approach identifies and formulates obligations based on these legal and
extra-legal considerations, and a process for territorial minorities to pursue external selfdetermination
if internal self-determination is denied. When considering possible local,
regional and international pressures affecting territorial minorities like economic
inequalities, human rights abuses, and the adverse effects of globalisation, is important
to appreciate that obligations cannot be defined by pre-set criteria, but are derived from
multi-party dialogue and the identification of specific rights, roles and responsibilities
belonging to territorial minorities, states and the international community.