posted on 2017-01-17, 12:11authored byJonathan Fulton
As China’s international political role grows from that of a regional to a global power,
its relations with states outside of its traditional sphere of interests is evolving. This is
certainly the case of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) member states, as levels of
interdependence between China and the GCC have increased dramatically in recent
years, and span across a wide range of interests. This dissertation asks the primary
question: what motivating factors explain Chinese leadership’s decision to forge closer
ties to the GCC? Are the relationships motivated by international systemic pressures,
unit-level domestic pressures, or a combination of both? From this initial question
follows two others: what is the motivation for GCC leaders in developing closer ties to
China, and what kind of role can China be expected to play in the region as levels of
interdependence intensify?
Using neoclassical realism to analyse the evolution of Sino-GCC relations, this
dissertation develops an original model of interpreting these relationships. With case
studies of China’s relations with Saudi Arabia, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates, this
dissertation examines the systemic and domestic pressures that shaped China’s policy
toward the Arab Gulf monarchies over four periods between 1949 and 2012:
indifference (1949-1965), hostility (1965-1971), transition (1971-1990), and
interdependence (1990-present). It demonstrates that systemic considerations were
predominant for much of the history of Sino-GCC relations, but beginning with the
Reform Era, domestic pressures within China came to play a significant role. This is
especially evident in analysing relations between 1990-2012. Relations during this
period are examined in detail across diplomatic and political interactions, trade and
investment, infrastructure and construction projects, people-to-people exchanges, and
military and security cooperation, demonstrating the depth and breadth and
interdependence as well as the international and domestic concerns addressed by the
relationships.
History
Supervisor(s)
Moran, Jon; Phythian, Mark
Date of award
2017-01-04
Author affiliation
Department of Politics and International Relations