University of Leicester
Browse

Degrees of difference: A case study of Forest School in England and Denmark.

Download (9.58 MB)
thesis
posted on 2020-11-28, 23:28 authored by Melanie J. Mackinder
Closely associated with the established Danish early years practice of Forest Kindergarten, Forest School in England is an alternative approach to young children playing outside. Considering the relationship between the two methods there is limited research that has directly compared the two approaches. Using an exploratory, comparative case study methodology, this project uses interviews, observations, and photo tours to explore pedagogy of Forest Learning, through adult’s interpretations and children's experiences in each context. The use of the environment in each context was also investigated. Data was analysed using an emergent, thematic analysis that allowed for the exploration of common elements while also identifying differences across the two cases. Using a constructivist perspective to explore the pedagogical approaches in each context it was possible to identify that the adults in each case interpreted and enacted pedagogy differently. Practitioners interpreted Forest School using a scaffolding approach, providing activities, toys, and equipment for children, in an outside environment, whereas pedagogues co-constructed Forest Kindergarten with children, through an outdoor environment. However, the children in each case, engaged similarly in child-initiated play, away from adults in favourite places and used natural resources creatively. In addition, the familiar natural features and fixed equipment provided security from which the children developed and initiated their own play.
It was found that in each context, the three elements of adult, child, and environment, were interpreted and experienced through a constructivist pedagogy in different ways, to produce an individual interpretation of Forest Learning.

History

Supervisor(s)

Phillip Wood

Date of award

2020-08-03

Author affiliation

School of Education

Awarding institution

University of Leicester

Qualification level

  • Doctoral

Qualification name

  • EdD

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Theses

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC