This thesis sets out the political rights that citizens are entitled to if they are to
participate in a process of public justification, and proposes a framework for when these
might legitimately be infringed upon. This framework is then applied to a series of
controversial cases involving non-violent far-right parties in Europe between 1993 and
2007.
The early chapters of the thesis set out a Rawlsian ideal of public justification and
defends this against the criticisms of contemporary theorists who offer alternative
versions of public reason. I argue that laws must be justified using reasons that are
accessible and, at some level, acceptable to all, and that a form of deliberative
democracy is constitutive of public justification. Deliberative democracy requires that
citizens have adequate status in political discussions. There is therefore an overarching
requirement of the state to ensure that citizens are able to participate in politics as equals
from which specific political rights can be derived. These include not only the
‘negative’ freedoms of expression and association, but ‘positive’ entitlements such as
support for political parties and campaign groups.
Whilst under ideal conditions citizens are able to exercise all of their political rights
simultaneously, under nonideal conditions some citizens behave in a way that prevents
others from effectively exercising these rights. Dilemmas arise when such behaviour
cannot be prevented without the state impinging upon some people’s political rights
itself. The thesis advocates a methodological approach to the application of ideal theory
that characterises these dilemmas as choices between sub-optimal outcomes. In such
cases there are strong pro tanto reasons for both state interference and non-interference
in political rights that must be assessed on a case-by-case basis. Later chapters apply
this approach to the real-world example involving far-right parties.
History
Supervisor(s)
Brace, Laura; Cooke, Stephen
Date of award
2017-10-13
Author affiliation
Department of Politics and International Relations