University of Leicester
Browse

Distinguishing between Orazio and Artemisia Gentileschi: A Reassessment of the Overlap in their Artworks

Download (20.1 MB)
thesis
posted on 2024-10-30, 10:02 authored by Jacob Willer

Attributions for a number of paintings have oscillated between Orazio Gentileschi and his daughter, Artemisia. The predominant tendency in recent scholarship has been to give these disputed paintings to Artemisia during the time of her education, possibly when still supervised by her father. Here it is argued instead that most of these paintings are by Orazio, or at least of his invention, and those that are by Artemisia were perhaps done later, when she returned to Rome – and to her father’s studio – rather than during her teenage years. To provide a basis for such an argument, all of Orazio’s known extant works from c.1600, when he established himself as an independent artist, until 1621, when he left Rome never to return, are recatalogued. The shape of a catalogue for Artemisia’s entire career is then drawn up, to show better how her personal sensibility always differed from her father’s. And various new attributions, as well as reattributions, are proposed along the way.

History

Supervisor(s)

David Ekserdjian; Sarah Knight

Date of award

2024-08-12

Author affiliation

History of Art and Film

Awarding institution

University of Leicester

Qualification level

  • Doctoral

Qualification name

  • PhD

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Theses

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC