posted on 2015-12-08, 14:59authored byColm Gallagher
Literature Review:
The aim of the review was to explore the research literature in relation to the
experiences of interpreters of migrants in a mental health context. A systematic
review of the literature was carried out in order to provide a thematic synthesis
of the findings of previous research. Of the 1805 articles found, eleven met the
inclusion criteria for the review. The process followed Thomas and Harden
(2008) recommendation of data collection, critical appraisal and thematic
synthesis. In total, five themes were uncovered. These were ‘mental health
interpreting is an enhanced role’; ‘bearing witness’; ‘emotional impact’;
‘relationship matters’ and ‘coping (trial and error)’. The literature purported to
show the added complexities of interpreting when compared to non mental
health settings. Interpreters can be emotionally affected whilst working in
mental health settings, this can relate to bearing witness to traumatic stories
which can cause distress and affect their wellbeing.
Research Report:
The research aimed to understand how Polish interpreters experience their
roles in adult mental health settings and to understand how they view the triadic
relationship between themselves, client and mental health professional when
interpreting. Six participants were recruited from interpreting services and each
took part in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were analysed using
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. The participants’ accounts clustered
around one superordinate theme of ‘being paid to be a machine for a human
role’. This was made up of three themes: ‘Just a linguist?’, ‘Unspoken alliances’
and ‘Communicating emotional reactions’. The findings of the current research
emphasise the importance for clinicians, mental health and interpreting services
to take into account the emotional impact, and disempowerment caused by
structural systemic factors which limit the voice of the interpreter.
Critical Appraisal:
Finally, the critical appraisal offers the researchers’ reflections on the research
process, methodological limitations and proposals for future research.