posted on 2015-08-05, 13:39authored byCharles Barthold
This thesis wanted to operate two tasks. First, this thesis sought to perform a description
of the contemporary functioning of the economy, that is to say of capitalism. This
entailed an analysis of the current financialisation of world capitalism. Second, this
thesis wanted to identify a revolutionary resistant subjectivity to financialisation. This
implied to look for a subjectivity which could successfully resist the power of finance.
The first task, that is to say the description of the contemporary economy, was
performed through an engagement with an interdisciplinary and Marxian literature that
problematised financialisation as a process related not only to the economy and
production, but also to the State, social reproduction and even subjectivity. Marxism
allowed me to understand the dynamics of capitalism and the current centrality of
finance, which was expressed by the concept of financialisation. However, Marxism
was unable to provide a sophisticated political strategy which would be based on a
specific revolutionary subjectivity. Marx’s oeuvre never provided very effective
political strategies. Therefore, the political economy of Marx was often complemented
by Leninism as a form of political strategy, based on party politics and the vanguard of
the proletariat. However, Leninism was connected to Fordist capitalism. Therefore, a
new political strategy was needed in the context of financialisation. The work of
Deleuze and Guattari provided a novel conceptualisation of subjectivity which could
articulate a revolutionary resistance to financialisation. My revolutionary understanding
of the oeuvre of Deleuze and Guattari was situated by an analysis of their reception by
political philosophy because alternative interpretations existed. Therefore, this thesis
sought to operate a fruitful dialogue, that is to say a resonance between Marx and
Deleuze and Guattari.