The psychosocial and support experiences of individuals who are identified as having severe and enduring ‘anorexia nervosa’: an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis
posted on 2018-11-07, 11:40authored byJessica Conrad-Czaja
Eating disorders are complex difficulties that can have a significant impact upon all
realms of an individual’s life. It is estimated that 70-80% of individuals diagnosed with
an eating disorder will experience recovery. However, others will go on to experience a
severe and enduring eating disorder. Research in this field has tended to focus on
adolescent experiences, treatment efficacy and outcomes.
The current literature review aimed to explore the ways in which adult individuals
experience, and make sense of, recovery from an eating disorder. Four electronic
databases were searched and nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings
suggested that recovery is a complex, dynamic and subjective process that involves the
choice to change, a variety of transitional processes and a conceptualisation of
recovery. Recovery was understood to be a comprehensive experience in which hope
and interpersonal relations are particularly crucial.
The current empirical study aimed to explore the psychosocial and support experiences
of individuals identified as having severe and enduring anorexia nervosa, as well as
their future hopes and needs. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six
females identified as having severe and enduring anorexia nervosa and these were
analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. The analysis generated four
super ordinate themes and 13 corresponding sub-themes. The themes were discussed in
relation to relevant psychological theory and previous research and the clinical
implications and recommendations for future research also discussed.
The critical appraisal offers a reflective account of the research process and includes the
professional and personal development of the researcher from undertaking the current
study. This aims to maximise transparency and offers a critique of the current research.
History
Supervisor(s)
Allan, Steven; Burgess, Gerald
Date of award
2018-10-02
Author affiliation
Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour