The ‘right to the city’ in the post-welfare metropolis. Community building, autonomous infrastructures and urban commons in Rome’s self-organised housing squats.
posted on 2018-06-15, 14:48authored byMargherita Grazioli
In the city of Rome, the housing crisis has reached emergency proportions as part of an
interrelated and ongoing crisis of social reproduction intrinsic to the process of neoliberal
restructuring in the prolonged aftermath of the 2008 economic crisis. Part of this crisis are the
estimated that 10,000 people are currently living inside more than 100 previously empty
buildings, of both private and public ownership, that have been occupied and self-renovated by
the squatters as an autonomous response towards their condition of severe housing deprivation.
These numbers present a continuum with the connotation of Rome as a self-made city in which
Housing Rights Movements have historically represented a catalyser for thriving urban struggles.
This thesis contends that nowadays housing squats represent spaces where the 'right to the city'
is re-appropriated through the autonomous regeneration of unused urban ecologies, the
commoning of social reproduction, and the crafting of urban commons. It aims at contributing to
the field of studies of Critical Organisation Studies, Urban Studies and Urban Geography
concerned with urban squatting and the organisational forms adopted by grassroots urban
movements within the current phase of post-crisis, post-welfare neoliberal restructuring.
The analysis is structured around the interviews, fieldnotes and visual materials collected during
a one-year long activist-ethnography carried out inside two housing squats affiliated with the
Movement Blocchi Precari Metropolitani, Tiburtina 770 and Metropoliz. Chapter 1
contextualises squatting for housing purposes within a broader crisis of social reproduction in
relation to the notion of 'right to the city'. Chapter 2 describes the epistemological,
methodological and ethical challenges intrinsic to the chosen activist-ethnographic approach for
its subjective orientation and scope. Chapter 3 contextualises the historical, geographical and
legislative framework pertaining squatting within which the Movements operate. Chapter 4
describes the social composition of the squatters and the initial process of community-building.
Chapter 5 recounts the making of the squats into autonomous infrastructures where producing
manifold urban commons. Chapter 6 discusses the different strategies of local activism and
networking implemented by the squatters. Chapter 7 narrates the role of squatters as part of the
Housing Rights Movements for contending 'right to the city', problematising it in relation to the
forms of activism and organisation they configure.