posted on 2010-08-04, 11:34authored byMaria Victoria Sebastian
One aspect of communication is investigated in this
thesis by studying what role context plays in both verbal,
either literal or metaphoric sense, and pictorial material.
The research is inspired by Bransford and Johnson's
(1972) study on cognitive prerequisites for comprehension.
It deals with the manipulation of context by pictorial
information and/or metaphoric cues.
The thesis examines three main questions. First, if
context plays an important role in both literal and
metaphoric prose. Secondly, if the appropriate context
is a function of the material being used. And finally,
whether schemata provided by the context are formed only
at encoding or, also, at retrieval for metaphoric prose.
The data suggested a positive answer to the three
main questions. They also showed that, for processing a
metaphoric prose, a significant interaction was found
between testtime and cue presentation when subjects were
presented the text and the pictures at the same time,
( context was manipulated in two ways: presentation of
material and cue). When the metaphoric cue was given at
encoding, recall performance deteriorated if subjects
were tested immediately but it improved over time. On the
contrary, when the cue was given at retrieval, the reverse
effect was found. It is emphasized how stronger elaborations
are needed to process this kind of material as
oppose to the processing of literal texts.
The role of context in prose processing, either in
its literal or metaphoric sense, as well as in pictures
is discussed in relation to schema theory and its
formation either at encoding or retrieval.