posted on 2016-12-05, 14:11authored byDavid J. Maund
The increasing urbanization of the countryside is
a process which all advanced societies are experiencing
at the present time. As a consequence the once simple and
distinct division between rural and urban no longer
applies. Usually urbanization of rural communities is
considered to be the process of intensification of typically
urban behaviour as a result of the diffusion of ideas and
behaviour patterns from the towns and cities. The majority
of geographical studies have been concerned with the impact
of the town or city on the surrounding area, particularly, the
changing land use pattern and the resultant planning problems. Within the framework of the rural-urban dichotomy
or continuum model attempts have been made to identify a
transitional zone, which is neither urban nor rural in
function, often called the rural-urban fringe. Unfortunately
these impact studies have tended to concentrate upon changes
in the structure of land use and morphology, and relatively
little attempt has been made to examine changes in demographic
and social structures involved in the urbanization
of the countryside. This is rather surprising since the·
changes involve the whole society, whether adjacent to a
metropolitan centre or a small town. This study reviews the
traditional geographical interpretation of the urbanisation
of the countryside, both in terms of process and place, and
suggests an alternative approach, behaviourlistic in
conception, as a framework for analysis.
The testing of this framework is in 46 Communities
in Herefordshire. Firstly, a socio-spatial classification
is made. Then an analysis in terms of social structure,
behaviour and attitudes is developed in an attempt to show
that groups of communities have distinctive characteristics
and are ordered spatially. Finally consideration is given
to the various agencies involved in the residential land
conversion process and their role in producing social change
in the countryside.