The literature review in this thesis is an exploration of the recent emphasis in policy on
the equality of mental health services for minority ethnic clients, with a focus on cultural
competence models in clinical psychology. The review is based on a textual analysis of a
policy document to consider whether cultural competence is a promotion or restriction of
equality. The policy and models of cultural competence were found to employ
essentialist definitions that could be an issue in developing appropriate and relevant
services. It is argued that a context-specific and flexible interpretation of culture is
required.
The empirical research examines clinical psychological discourses about working with
minority ethnic clients. It discusses an interview study and a group discussion study
conducted among clinical psychologists. Drawing on discourse analysis this research
examines the interpretative repertoires and discursive strategies that psychologists use in
their accounts of working with minority ethnic clients, and how these construct a
particular version of cultural competence. In the interviews, an interpretative framework
in terms of 'social context' involved a consideration of the client's cultural background,
and an interpretative framework of 'individual context' was considered to be a way of
formulating the client's own interpretation of cultural background. In the group
discussion, the key interpretative framework was the 'individual/curious' repertoire,
which also focused on understanding cultural background from the client's interpretation.
It is shown that in using these repertoires the psychologists' construction of cultural
competence oscillates between a risk of reifying minority ethnic groups and a risk of
neglecting issues such as ethnic discrimination.
Based upon the literature and empirical parts, the reflective part of this thesis considers
the researchers orientation to the research, in terms of epistemology, and as a minority
ethnic researcher conducting research on the subject of minorities.